Baycol Cases

Baycol Cases

Information and Resources on Baycol Cases

A Guide to Information and Resources on Baycol Cases


Baycol Claims Settled
> Baycol Cases

Baycol:
Baycol Cases Settled

In 2003, there have been a number of Baycol claims settled in the U.S. - These settlements have been involving injuries related to a condition called rhabdomyolysis, which the patients developed after taking the drug.

Baycol is a prescription drug manufactured by Bayer A.G. Pharmaceutical. Baycol (cerivastatin) was initially approved in the U.S. in 1997 to treat patients with elevated cholesterol levels. Baycol belongs to the family of drugs reffered to as statins: Statins lower cholesterol by blocking a specific enzyme in the body that is involved in the sythesis of cholesterol.

Baycol was recalled on August 8, 2001 following the deaths of 31 patients taking the drug in the U.S. Fifty-two deaths had been reported worldwide. The deaths had been caused by rhabdomyolysis, a muscle condition/ailment that had been known to be a possible side effect of all statin drugs, however, its incidence has been much higher and more serious among Baycol patients. Rhabdomyolysis is a condition where the muscle cells are damaged, thus releasing a pigment called myoglobin into the bloodstream. The myoglobin becomes entrapped in the kidneys, clogging up the filtering process of the kidneys, leading to kidney or renal failure and other organ system disorders. Symptoms of rhabdomyolysis include muscle pain, weakness, tenderness, malaise, fever, dark urine, nausea, and vomiting. The pain may involve specific groups of muscles or may be generalized throughout the body.

In August 2003 Bayer AG reported that more than 9,400 lawsuits involving Baycol have been filed against the company, of which approximately 1,042 have been settled out of court. This total number of Baycol cases includes both individual Baycol injury claims and Baycol death claims as well as numerous different types of Baycol class actions. Here is a Reuters article with the details:



Following is an Associated Press article from March 10, 2004:


Bayer Reaches Deal On Cholesterol Drug

03/10/04 - German drug maker Bayer AG has reached an agreement with most of its insurers on coverage of around $1.2 billion for litigation related to the 2001 withdrawal of a cholesterol-lowering drug.

In a statement Tuesday night, Bayer also said it had put aside 300 million euros ($369 million) in its 2003 fiscal year to cover additional settlements and defense costs. The insurers "had previously proceeded only on a provisional basis," the company said.

Bayer pulled Lipobay, marketed as Baycol in the United States, in August 2001 after it was linked to a rare muscle-wasting syndrome and about 100 patient deaths.

On Tuesday, the Leverkusen-based company said it has now reached 2,224 cases related to the drug, paying out $842 million without admitting liability.

Another 9,948 cases were pending in the United States as of March 5, Bayer said.

"Where facts have been developed in the course of the litigation, it so far appears that the vast majority of plaintiffs did not suffer serious side-effects," its statement said.


ref: Julie Kay, "A Sudden Rush to Settle Suits Over Baycol" Miami Daily Business Review - 2-26-2003

If you have an interest in the Baycol cases, it is much to your advantage to contact an attorney who advertises having experience and knowledge in Baycol litigation. The circumstances of each person's use of the drug will differ, and will determine the course of action particular to the individual case. There are various lawyers devoted to these cases and most offer services on a no-win no-fee basis. This is an important factor to ascertain when contacting a Baycol lawyer.


Home | Baycol Side Effects | Baycol Litigation Info |
Baycol Fibromyalgia | Baycol Class Action | Baycol Litigation
Baycol Side Effects Lawyer | Site Map

 

Search the web with Google

Baycol-claims-settled.com is a general information web site provided for all visitors seeking to understand their legal rights, but it is not a substitute for legal or medical advice or qualified legal or medical recommendations.